A legal win adds momentum in lawsuit against City

A ruling by Judge Victor M. Torres of San Diego Superior Court has handed an important win to the Fairbanks Polo Club Homes (FPCH) homeowners’ association in their ongoing lawsuit against the City of San Diego, Surf Sports, and Ocean Industries. The September 9, 2026 ruling ended the defendants’ attempt to knock out FPCH’s position through a motion for judgement on the pleadings.

In his ruling, Judge Torres found that questions remain about what happened when Ocean Industries assigned all its rights under the 1983 Grant Deed to FPCH nine years ago, and specifically whether Ocean Industries in doing so, may have lost the ability to exercise the power to terminate the deed restrictions as it did in concert with the San Diego City Council in October 2025.

That disgraceful vote by the City Council ended 40 years of open-space protection over some 600 acres in the San Dieguito River Valley including the 114-acre former polo fields in the San Dieguito River Valley leased by Surf Sports since 2016. Instead of enforcing the law, the City Council rewarded a decade of violations by raising Surf’s annual event limit from 25 to 40 days — a farcical gesture given that Surf’s public 2026 calendar already schedules 29 events across 80-plus days, more than triple the original limit. In addition, the City voted to exempt their tenant’s commercial activities from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a decision that could come back to haunt them; notably, it opened the door to yet another lawsuit against the City filed by the Sierra Club last December. That suit is moving forward through the discovery phase.

Meanwhile, Judge Torres’ ruling now gives the Coalition real momentum and means FPCH can continue to pursue its arguments in court and to seek a clear determination of whether the protections in the 1983 Grant Deed remain in force.

Of note is that the court's written ruling went further than a simple denial — it specifically questioned whether Ocean acted in good faith when it gave away its enforcement rights to FPCH in 2017 and then, years later, turned around and helped the City try to erase the very protections it had signed away. While the court was careful to note that it was not making a final ruling on that question at this early stage, it found it entirely reasonable to conclude that Ocean’s about-face “does not appear to be in good faith” and may amount to a breach of its own agreement. That is a meaningful signal from the bench.

None of this is possible without your continued support. Litigating against a municipal government, a private equity group, and a corporate developer is exactly as resource-intensive as it sounds. Every contribution helps the FPCH legal team and keeps the pressure on the City, Surf, and Ocean to honor the promises made more than forty years ago. We are ever grateful to the scores of nearby homeowners’ associations, residents of surrounding communities, and environmental organizations who have already supported this fight. If you have already given, thank you — and if you haven't yet, now is the time. You can donate directly by paying into a fund held and managed by Coast Law Group for the sole purpose of funding the litigation herehttps://secure.lawpay.com/pages/coastlaw/trust Please list “Fairbanks litigation” in the Reference. All funds will be used for legal fees and costs. Donations are not tax exempt.

 

Sierra Club fires first salvo

The San Diego chapter of the Sierra Club has sent a formal demand letter to the City of San Diego to immediately cease and redress the continuing intensification of unmitigated impactful uses of land in the San Dieguito River Valley.

The Sierra Club filed its lawsuit in December 2025 in response to the San Diego City Council’s October vote to gut the 1983 grant deed restrictions and open-space protections over the former polo fields leased by Surf Cup Sports since 2016. The City also voted to amend the lease to exempt their long-term tenant’s commercial activities from any environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Sierra Club alleges these actions directly violate CEQA by failing to analyze and mitigate the impacts of Surf Cup Sports’ intensified commercial use of the fields on traffic, open space, and the surrounding ecosystem.

Click here or on the link above to read the letter.

A slight legal detour, but still on track

Following last October’s disgraceful vote by the San Diego City Council to remove open-space protections on the former Polo Fields, amend Surf Cup Sports’ lease on the 114-acre property, and exempt Surf from environmental review, the Fairbanks Polo Club Homes homeowners’ association (FPCH) filed a motion for preliminary injunction.

That motion sought a declaration that Ocean Industries, having assigned to FPCH and thereby given up all its rights under the 1983 Grant Deed, necessarily gave up its right under that deed to amend it. The Hon. Judge Earl H. Maas III on January 16, 2026 denied that motion for a preliminary injunction – but not on its merits. Judge Maas was uncomfortable with the remedy of a court order prohibiting Ocean from signing the grant deed termination. Instead, the judge invited the FPCH legal team to reformulate the motion as one for summary adjudication to resolve the issue before continuing to a trial. A new hearing and ruling are expected in three to four months.

We remain confident that there is strong merit in the case; that the assignment was to FPCH; and that by giving them the assignment, Ocean gave up all rights, including the right to terminate the Grant Deed.

No bad deed goes unnoticed

The Sierra Club has filed a lawsuit in response to the City of San Diego’s unconscionable October 2025 vote to remove open-space protections on the former polo fields and exempt their long-term tenant, Surf Cup Sports, from any environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

The lawsuit, filed Dec. 5, 2025, challenges the City Council’s actions affecting the lands in the San Dieguito River Valley and sets out numerous reasons for strict environmental review including impacts on natural resources, public safety, and equitable access. Addressing the latter concern in a Dec. 8 press release, Sierra Club San Diego Chair Lisa Ross stated: “Every child deserves access to publicly owned open space, trails, and passive recreational opportunities, not just those who play organized sports or families who can afford the fees.”

Click here to read the full press release.

 

Another lease violation and the City punts, again

The San Diego City Attorney continues to stonewall any attempt gather information or answer questions about the presence of a commercial youth training facility on the northeast corner of the sports fields Surf Cup Sports leases from the City. In January 2025 black chain-link fencing was erected around a small field of artificial turf anchored by a large, electrified shipping container filled with gym equipment, audio speakers, and ice baths. By March adults and young boys and girls were enrolled in strength and conditioning programs under the auspices of Performance Lab. No permits were filed for or approved for this business on City land.

Nearly a year after the facility was installed and operating, Nick Baldwin, a program manager in the City’s real estate division offered this explanation: “Surf has requested consent to use the small fenced in area for small group training for a joint venture Surf is doing with another entity. The City is evaluating that request but no decision has been made at this time.”

The most recent response from the City to a request for information about the Performance Lab facility

Surf Cup Sports and/or Performance Lab could face significant liability issues for allowing an unpermitted gym to train minors, as the operation likely violates multiple regulations designed for public safety, especially regarding children. One would also think liabilities could arise from liability claims, inadequate supervision, lack of necessary insurance coverage, and failure to enforce municipal codes.

Further, an unpermitted facility on City property likely has not undergone the necessary inspections to ensure compliance with local zoning laws and codes. The City’s awareness and failure to act on these violations could expose it to liability if injuries result from these issues.

The City of San Diego has specific ordinances requiring permits for commercial recreational activities to ensure public safety and access. By knowingly allowing an unpermitted operation to continue, the City once again has failed in its duty to enforce its own regulations.

Down, but not out

The San Diego City Council, led by District 1 City Councilmember Joe LaCava, sealed their sweeping betrayal of public trust October 27, 2025 by removing the grant deed protections on the former polo fields and amending Surf Cup Sports’ lease for the 114-acre property. The Council also illegally exempted Surf actions from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Unfortunately, Mr. La Cava and his colleagues had negotiated a deal with Surf and made the decision well before the meeting. They disregarded the impassioned voices of environmental leaders, officials from neighboring cities, scores of concerned residents, as well as thousands of letters of opposition. The motion passed 6-2-1, with councilmembers Marni von Wilpert and Raul Campillo opposed and Jennifer Campbell absent. 

The outcome was a tough and even traumatic experience. We put our hearts into this effort because we care deeply about truth, fairness, and protecting the land that belongs to all San Diegans. Thank you to everyone who showed up to sit through the Council’s insulting charade, Surf’s bluster, and the city attorney’s misrepresentations. Thank you for every letter, every meeting, every late-night message, every personal speech, every donation of money, time, and service. We’ve shown what real civic engagement looks like. We’ve also built something meaningful – a network of public servants, environmentalists, neighbors, and advocates who know how to organize, speak up, and care fiercely for our shared river valley. That doesn’t end here.

Do not be discouraged. We are down but not out. The action does not render the other lawsuits moot and will likely lead to other lawsuits, especially with regard to CEQA. The first step is a motion for preliminary injunction that will seek a declaration that Ocean Industries, having assigned to the Fairbanks Polo Club Homes HOA and thereby given up all its rights under the Grant Deed, necessarily gave up its right under that deed to amend it. 

We will keep you apprised of any new developments and again, extend our deepest gratitude to all of you who have stood with us in this fight.  

Now is the time

The City of San Diego is meeting Monday, October 27 to decide the fate of our river valley. This is your chance to let City leaders know how much the open space in our community means to you.

Surf Sports has been moving swiftly and behind closed doors to remove the deed restrictions to the former polo fields and negotiate an addendum to their lease that would hand them unbridled control of the City-owned fields with no end date – and allow them to continue to reap vast profits from exploitation of public land. None of these maneuvers benefit the surrounding communities or the taxpayers.

Location: City Council Chambers, 12th Floor, 202 C Street, San Diego
Date: Monday, October 27
Time: 2:00 p.m.

Let’s pack the City Council Chambers and show the City that we won’t stand for a land grab by millionaire corporate investors.

• Rally your neighbors and your community to write to each City Council Member now. Names and email addresses can be found here.
• Write Public Comment on non-agenda for October 21 meeting. Link here.
• Write Public Comment for the agenda item for October 27. Link here.
• Speak in person on October 27. We need fresh voices. Sign up to speak here.

Join the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, community planning groups, environmental organizations, homeowners associations, and thousands of individuals and families who have voiced their opposition to San Diego’s plan to gut the Grant Deed restrictions.

Click here to sign the petition.
Questions? Or to get involved, contact the Coalition here.

Add your voice to the many thousands in opposition to San Diego’s plan to gut Grant Deed protections

Please sign the petition at the link below to share your concerns about the resolution to be considered by the San Diego City Council that could gut the Grant Deed restrictions governing use of the former polo fields – and support the community in protecting our open space in the San Dieguito River Valley against Surf Sports profiteers.

https://win.newmode.net/coalitiontopreservethepolofields/votenoonremovingthelandrestrictionsandsupportthecommunitytoprotectouropenspaceagainstsurfsportsprofiteers

What if it were more than just a fender bender?

The inevitable automobile accident at the entrance to Surf Sports Park on July 27, 2025, drives home the danger posed by the confluence of fast-moving regular traffic and endless lines of vehicles entering and exiting this hazardous location for weekly sports tournaments and practices throughout the year.

It’s also a stark reminder of the vulnerability of surrounding communities in the event of a natural disaster – and the City of San Diego’s complete lack of concern, accountability, or enforcement of public safety regulations at this site and on the fields. 

Predictably, Sunday afternoon eastbound and westbound traffic on Via de la Valle, a two-lane rural road, came to a standstill for nearly an hour with cars backed up for a mile in both directions. Frustrated drivers soon began making illegal U-turns to avoid the gridlock.   

The Rancho Santa Fe Fire Department was at the scene in 11 minutes. Thankfully, there were no serious injuries. Twenty-two minutes after the accident an ambulance arrived and took a passenger with a fractured wrist to the hospital – a clear indication that neither Emergency Medical Services personnel nor Basic Life Support Ambulance(s) were present as required by the City for such an event with thousands of athletes, coaches, referees, vendors, and spectators. 

For over a year the Coalition and Friends of the San Dieguito River Valley have called on the City of San Diego’s Fire-Rescue Department (SDFD) and the office of City Council president Joe LaCava of District One, to confirm if a state-mandated evacuation plan exists for the sports fields in the event of a real emergency, and if not, why not. The SDFD appears to have been cowed into silence by the City or its Department of Real Estate and Airport Management (DREAM) that manages the Surf Cup Sports lease.

Meanwhile, a resolution proposed by the City and its lessee, Surf Cup Sports, to terminate the restrictive covenants in the Grant Deed which have in principle governed use of the playing fields, is intended as an end run around the Fairbanks Polo Club Homes’ lawsuit brought to enforce those very use-restrictions that have been in place since 1983. The City and Surf, having secured agreement from Ocean Industries, Inc., a successor to the original owner of the land, expect the City Council to approve the resolution sometime this summer – a date cannot be confirmed for the vote – to erase the covenants, moot the litigation, and thus deprive a judge of the opportunity to enforce them. This would shield the City and Surf from past violations and award them free rein over the former polo fields in the future, regardless of the destructive effect on neighboring communities and with little regard for public safety.

America’s finest collusion

In a disturbing development in the lawsuit brought by Fairbanks Polo Club Homes against the City of San Diego to enforce the land-use and environmental restrictions governing the former polo fields in the San Dieguito River Valley, it appears the City now has colluded with Surf Cup Sports and Ocean Industries – the original owner of the polo fields – to ask the City Council to erase those restrictions altogether.  

This is no less than an attempt to prevent the court from adjudicating in the Fairbanks case whether the City and Surf are in violation of those restrictions, and, even more important, to remove those legal safeguards from Surf’s future exploitation of the fields. If the City Council agrees, it would completely eviscerate the legal protections that were expressly for the benefit of communities neighboring the fields and to which the City and Surf freely agreed when they leased the land in the first place. 

The City, for its part, agreed to those use restrictions when it acquired the polo fields in 1983 through a Grant Deed which required the restrictions as part of the deal. Surf, in turn, agreed to abide by the Grant Deed incorporating those restrictions when it signed the lease for the 114-acre property in 2016.  

Yet in a joint filing dated June 30, 2025, the City and Surf announced that they have agreed with Ocean “to present a resolution to the City Council which would result in a termination of the use restrictions [in the Grant Deed] that are the subject of the [Fairbanks] litigation.” Now the legal battle that was expected to take place in a courtroom in December, appears headed for a purely political decision at the City Council sometime in September. 

As of this writing we are waiting to hear from the Coast Law team on next steps and how individuals, homeowners’ associations, and businesses can best express their alarm directly to the City Council, either in writing, in person at the City Council, or both.  

In the meantime, please share this information widely with your neighbors and friends in Rancho Santa Fe, Carmel Valley, Del Mar, Solana Beach and other communities that have been adversely affected by Surf’s overuse of the fields and associated traffic, noise, and dust – and which fear how the City and Surf may exacerbate those harms in the future if existing legal safeguards are removed.